« Helpless | Main | The Draining American Life »

June 18, 2008

Jesus and Dinosaurs

I saw this on Dan Kimbal's blog.  Is this even a part of the debate?

posted by Brad

Jesus_and_dinosaurs_5

Posted at 09:58 AM |

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c2ac69e200e5535d15fe8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Jesus and Dinosaurs:

Comments

woah, woah, woah! There were DINOSAURS on the ark!?!?!

Posted by: Just Matt | June 18, 2008 at 11:55 AM

Know about the dinosaurs on the ark. Know about them surviving the flood. Know about Jesus riding them? Uh ... No.

But that picture ROCKS!

Posted by: Loren Eaton | June 18, 2008 at 12:01 PM

If dinosaurs were on the ark, why didn't they make it into the Arky Arky song? Triceratopses and Raptor-raptoroosies...!

And according to the picture, we now know that dinosaurs are extinct because Jesus was radioactive.

Posted by: amy | June 18, 2008 at 01:46 PM

favorite

Posted by: Filipe | June 18, 2008 at 01:53 PM

Wait...I am still stuck on them being on the ark...Loren you said you knew... HOW? Why didn't you tell me?
And if they were on the ark - then why didn't they eat EVERYTHING? How did a brontasaurous(sp?) fit on the ark?

Amy - Best comment ever. Both of them.

Posted by: Just Matt | June 18, 2008 at 02:12 PM

It's a great picture, but I think the dinosaur is laughing hysterically. Could be a pre-incarnate Jesus having fun with the creation. My bet.

An adult diploducus measured approximately 170 feet from nose to tail and weighed 15 tons. Keep in mind, you'd need two of them for the ark. Forget about what they ate, how would they have dealt with all that poop? Wait, remember Ezekiel 4:10, they could use it like wood and burn it in the ovens....never mind. Funny how the Ezekiel 4:9 Bread at Whole Foods never mentions anything about Ezekiel 4:10.

Posted by: Jim J | June 19, 2008 at 05:57 PM

But is most of what we know about dinos true...so how can we make accurate assumptions as to whether or not they were on the ark? A lot of those measurements and facts are based on an evolutionary model...not sure if they can be trusted. I think it's possible they were on the ark. If God was able to keep the lions from eating the springboks, he can keep the dinos from eating everything else.

On a lighter, but still serious note, I do believe in the Loch Ness Monster. I believe it's a leftover dino. For real.

Posted by: Vanessa | June 21, 2008 at 07:11 PM

Well Watson, its obvious that the translators of English versions of the Bible mistranslated white horse when the Hebrew word really meant Velociraptor. ::blows his bubbly pipe::

Posted by: John Thompson | June 22, 2008 at 07:00 PM

V - Amy's Seen Betsy! Ask her about it!

JT- You are too funny.

Posted by: Just Matt | June 23, 2008 at 09:23 AM

I think he means "Nessie."

Posted by: amy | June 23, 2008 at 10:19 AM

I was excited that Nessie might have a twin (the one that even Loch Ness hunters won't talk about...because of her clubbed foot of course).

Posted by: Brad | June 23, 2008 at 10:53 AM

you are all jerks : P Funny jerks...but jerks non-the-less. So I called nessie, Betsy. I mean that is what we American's do - right? Americanize everything. I was just continuing that tradition here. You're welcome

Posted by: Just Matt | June 23, 2008 at 02:15 PM

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

Posted by:  | 

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment